Stan Abrams over at China Hearsay is (or will be?) speaking on China intellectual property at an IP conference for SMEs in the Netherlands and he has mapped out on his blog what he is going to say. And here it is: 1.... [[ This is a content summary only.... ...full story at China Law Blog
from China Law Blog on Thu, Sep 10 2009
see also:
| 21 Nov 09 |
|
U.S. China Trade Conference (Summary) » YouTube |
| 05 Sep 07 |
|
Free China IP Seminar: Kansas City, September 19-20, 2007 » China Law Blog The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is putting on another in its series of free seminars on China intellectual property. The seminar is entitled, "Conference on Protecting Your Intellectual Property in China and the Global Marketplace"... |
| 08 Apr 08 |
|
Jury Nullification With Chinese Characteristics » China Law Blog Stan Abrams of the always excellent China Hearsay blog just posted on the decision of a Guangzhou court to dramatically reduce a previous verdict of life imprisonment to a five-year jail term for a person convicted of stealing money from a bank by taking... |
| 01 Apr 09 |
|
China to strengthen protection of intellectual property rights » People's Daily Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao said here Wednesday the government would increase efforts to protect intellectual property rights (IPR). Wen was speaking in a meeting with Francis Gurry, director-general of the World Intellectual Property Organization... |
| 19 Apr 08 |
|
China Law As Guessing Game » China Law Blog Stan Abrams over at China Hearsay did a great post, detailing the difficulties of uncertainty in dealing with Chinese law. The post is entitled, "The Law and New Tech in China," but the issue it raises regarding the gaps in China's commercial laws goes... |
| 12 Nov 09 |
|
ISP Liability for Infringing Content: Blogger Beware » China Law Blog Chinese ISPs are often criticized for removing content from their sites that anyone suggests may be defamatory or violate some other party's intellectual property rights. This criticism is not really justified because... [[ This is a content summary... |